AI governance frameworks: Compare

A learning aid, not legal advice.

Depth, from 0 (least) to 3 (most)0123Under review
Frameworks to compare

Pick two or three frameworks.

Dimension
Singapore Model AI Governance Framework (second edition), with the frameworks for generative AI and agentic AI
voluntary guidance
Nature
Depth 1 of 3.

Voluntary guidance; the Personal Data Protection Act is the binding backdrop.

Model AI Governance Framework, second edition
Where and to whom it applies
Depth 2 of 3.

Any organisation deploying AI, in any sector; meant to be adapted to its context.

Model AI Governance Framework, second edition
Roles addressed
Depth 1 of 3.

Addressed to the deploying organisation; the generative AI framework adds accountability across the development chain.

Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI, dimension 1 (Accountability)
Risk approach
Depth 2 of 3.

The level of human involvement in AI-augmented decisions is set according to the risk of harm.

Second edition, area 2 (human involvement)
Inventory and documentation
Depth 1 of 3.

The self-assessment guide helps organisations record their practices against the framework.

Implementation and Self-Assessment Guide for Organisations (ISAGO)
Risk or impact assessment
Depth 1 of 3.

Self-assessment against the framework to find gaps, not an impact assessment.

ISAGO
Human oversight
Depth 3 of 3.

A central area of the framework: deciding how much human involvement AI-augmented decisions need.

Second edition, area 2 (human involvement)
Transparency and notices
Depth 2 of 3.

Stakeholder interaction and communication is one of four areas; decisions made with AI should be explainable, transparent and fair.

Second edition, area 4
Data governance
Depth 2 of 3.

Advisory guidelines explain how the PDPA applies to personal data in AI recommendation and decision systems; data is a dimension of the generative AI framework.

PDPC Advisory Guidelines (2024-03-01)
Testing, robustness and security
Depth 3 of 3.

AI Verify: a testing framework on 11 principles with a toolkit that runs in the organisation's own environment; testing and assurance is a generative AI dimension.

AI Verify
Monitoring and incident reporting
Depth 1 of 3.

Incident reporting is a dimension of the generative AI framework, on a voluntary basis.

Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI, incident reporting dimension
Assurance and enforcement
Depth 1 of 3.

AI Verify produces a test report; there are no sanctions under the frameworks, and PDPC enforces only the PDPA.

AI Verify; PDPC
Effort to implement
Depth 1 of 3.

Low to moderate and self-paced; AI Verify testing is optional.

ISAGO; AI Verify
Key dates
Depth 1 of 3.

Second edition 2020-01-21; generative AI framework 2024-05-30; agentic AI framework 2026-01-22. No dated obligations.

PDPC; AI Verify Foundation; IMDA press release

A learning aid, not legal advice. Where AI SENTINEL is mentioned, it supports or maps to the dimension; it does not certify anything. Dates are those the official texts state on the date shown.